Zen and the Art of Dissatisfaction – Part 18

Humanity’s Legacy of Extinction and Exploitation

For centuries, human societies—whether ancient hunter-gatherers or modern industrial empires—have played a central role in the extinction of Earth’s largest animals. Although we often romanticise early humans as living in harmony with nature, archaeological and ecological evidence tells a different story. This blog post explores the global impact of Homo sapiens on megafauna, marine ecosystems, and keystone species across continents and millennia, from prehistoric Africa to industrial Japan. It also highlights the ongoing environmental and ethical consequences of our actions.

Originally published in Substack: https://substack.com/@mikkoijas

Humans have consistently driven megafauna to extinction wherever they have migrated. While we may associate the last remaining hunter-gatherers in Africa, Australia, or the Americas with sustainable living, historical patterns suggest otherwise. Wherever Homo sapiens arrived, they rapidly exterminated dangerous predators, large herbivores, and flightless birds.

The Human Legacy of Megafauna Extinction

One striking exception is Africa, where large land mammals have coexisted with humans far longer. This prolonged co-evolution allowed these animals to adapt to human presence. In other parts of the world, some megafauna managed to survive alongside humans—such as various species of bears, moose, deer, and the American bison. Europe’s bison relative, the wisent, nearly went extinct in the 20th century but was saved by zoos.

Even so, ancient hunter-gatherers eventually reached a balance with their prey. Among the San people of the Kalahari, for instance, there’s a known reluctance to hunt declining species. This balance was disrupted by European settlers, leaving San communities today unable to practice their traditions freely.

In North America, indigenous peoples coexisted with the American bison until European settlers deliberately disrupted the balance. Settlers intentionally slaughtered bison to deprive native populations of their primary resource. In the 1700s, 25–30 million bison roamed the plains. By 1880, systematic hunting—sometimes by the U.S. Army—reduced their population to under 100 individuals.

Human impact has extended deep into marine ecosystems. Although coastal communities have fished for thousands of years, their practices rarely led to ecological collapse. According to Curtis Marean, a professor of archaeology at Arizona State University, early Homo sapiens may have survived an extreme ice age (c. 195,000–123,000 years ago) by turning to coastal diets. Marean’s work at Pinnacle Point near Mossel Bay has shown that ancient humans relied on seafood like shellfish and marine mammals. This dietary shift played a crucial role in the survival of early humans during a population bottleneck when their numbers dropped to a few hundred individuals.

Nearby Blombos Cave, studied by archaeologists like Christopher Henshilwood, has yielded the earliest evidence of symbolic thought and advanced tools, including beads and bone-tipped spears.

Although early coastal communities scavenged stranded whales, they did not hunt them at scale. The Romans may have initiated the first industrial whale hunts, particularly off the Gibraltar peninsula, as confirmed by recent findings from Ana Rodrigues’ research team (2018). Later, the Basques became renowned whale hunters, operating from the 1000s to the 1500s across the North Atlantic. By the early 1900s, the North Atlantic right whale population had dropped to about 100. Recent estimates suggest there are only 336 left today.

Tuna, Greed, and the Cold Economics of Extinction

Whales are not the only marine giants hunted to the brink. Species like the bluefin tuna have faced similar pressure. On the Western Atlantic, tuna catches jumped from 1,000 tonnes in 1960 to 18,000 tonnes by 1964—only to collapse by 80% within the same decade. In the Mediterranean, overfishing continued longer but reached catastrophic levels by 1998, leading the IUCN to classify the species as endangered.

The surge in demand came from Japan, where raw tuna is essential for sushi and sashimi. In particular, the fatty underbelly known as otoro became a luxury delicacy in the 1960s. Meanwhile, in the West, tuna was mostly used for cat food.

Today, approximately 80% of all bluefin tuna caught globally is shipped to Japan. The Japanese conglomerate Mitsubishi controls about 40% of the global market, freezing and stockpiling tuna to artificially inflate scarcity and profit margins. Ironically, the Fukushima nuclear disaster compromised these stores when the electricity failed, ruining thousands of tonnes of frozen fish.

From an ecological viewpoint, Mitsubishi’s actions are deeply unethical. From an economic lens, however, they are brutally rational—rarity increases value. As stocks dwindle, prices rise, and shareholders benefit. The more endangered tuna become, the more lucrative they are.

All signs suggest that the oceans are under enormous pressure due to climate change. Seas are warming, acidifying, and absorbing unprecedented levels of carbon dioxide from human activity. In addition, they are polluted and eutrophicated by agriculture and industry.

The Baltic Sea, for example, is the most polluted marine area in the world—thanks in part to the impacts of livestock farming. The same agricultural runoff pollutes Finland’s lakes and rivers.

Ocean ecosystems are remarkably sensitive. A 2°C rise may seem minor—until we compare it to the human body. If your body temperature increased by two degrees and stayed there, you’d die. The sea is no different.

In her book On Fire (2020), journalist Naomi Klein reflects on the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Operated by Transocean and leased by BP, it remains the largest marine oil spill in history. Witnesses described the ocean as if it were bleeding. Klein recalls being struck by how the oil’s swirling patterns resembled prehistoric cave paintings—one shape even resembled a bird gasping for air, its eyes staring skyward.

Conclusion

From mammoths and bison to whales and tuna, humanity has left a trail of extinction and ecosystem collapse in its wake. Whether through hunting, pollution, or industrial overreach, our actions have irreversibly altered life on Earth. The myth of ancient ecological harmony dissolves under the weight of archaeological evidence and ecological reality. If we are to prevent the next wave of mass extinctions, we must confront the past honestly and reshape our relationship with the natural world—before there is nothing left to save.


References

Henshilwood, C. S. (2002). The Blombos Cave and the origins of symbolic thinking. Science, 295(5558), 1278–1280. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067575

Hickman, M. (2009). Mitsubishi and the bluefin tuna trade. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk

Klein, N. (2020). On Fire: The Burning Case for a Green New Deal. Penguin Books.

Lindsay, J. (2011). Mitsubishi loses tons of tuna after Fukushima power failure. Environmental News Network. Retrieved from https://www.enn.com

Marean, C. W. (2010). When the Sea Saved Humanity. Scientific American, 303(2), 54–61.

Rodrigues, A. et al. (2018). Forgotten whales: Evidence of ancient whaling by the Romans in the Gibraltar region. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1873). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1088

IUCN. (1998). Bluefin tuna listed as endangered. International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://www.iucn.org

Zen and the Art of Dissatisfaction – Part 15

The Climate Story, The End of Holocene Stability 

Throughout human history, never before has the capital of states been as urgently needed as it is today. Canadian journalist, author, professor, and activist Naomi Klein, in her book On Fire (2020), argues that the accumulated wealth of the fossil fuel industry should be redirected as soon as possible to support the development of new, greener infrastructure. This process would also create new jobs. Similarly, Klein proposes a novel state-supported project whereby citizens help restore natural habitats to their original condition.

Originally published in Substack https://substack.com/history/post/164484451

In my public talks on climate, I often present a chart illustrating climate development in relation to the evolution of our species. The climate has warmed and cooled several times during the existence of Homo sapiens. Those who justify their privileged business-as-usual lifestyles often wrongly exploit this detail, because the rapid changes and fluctuations have always been deadly. 

From the Miocene Epoch to the Rise of Humans

The chart begins in the Miocene epoch, shortly before the Pliocene, a geological period lasting from about 5.3 to 2.6 million years ago. Around the boundary of the Miocene and Pliocene, approximately six million years ago, the evolutionary paths of modern humans and chimpanzees diverged. During the Pliocene, the Earth’s average temperature gradually decreased. Around the middle of the Pliocene, the global temperature was roughly 2–3 degrees Celsius warmer than today, causing sea levels to be about 25 metres higher.

The temperature target of the Paris Agreement is to keep warming below +1.5 degrees Celsius. However, the countries that ratified the agreement have failed to meet this goal, and we are now headed back toward Miocene-era temperatures. Bill Gates (2021) reminds us that the last time the Earth’s average temperature was over four degrees warmer than today, crocodiles lived north of the Arctic Circle.

As the climate cooled and Africa’s rainforest areas shrank, a group of distant ancestors of modern humans adapted to life in woodlands and deserts, searching for food underground in the form of roots and tubers instead of relying on rainforest fruits. By the end of the Pliocene, the Homo erectus, or upright humans, appear in the archaeological record. Homo erectus is the most successful of all past human species, surviving in various parts of the world for nearly two million years. The oldest Homo erectus remains date back about two million years from Kenya, and the most recent ones are around 110,000 years old from the Indonesian island of Java.

Homo erectus travelled far from their African birthplace, reaching as far as Indonesia, adapting to diverse natural conditions. They likely tracked animals in various terrains, exhausting large antelopes and other prey by running them down until they could be suffocated or killed with stones. The animals were then butchered using stone tools made on site for specific purposes.

The Pleistocene and the Emergence of Modern Humans

About one million years ago, the Pliocene gave way to the Pleistocene epoch, a colder period marked by significant fluctuations in the Earth’s average temperature. The Pleistocene lasted from around one million to roughly 11,500 years ago. It is best known for the Earth’s most recent ice ages, when the Northern Hemisphere was covered by thick ice sheets.

Modern humans appear in the archaeological record from the Pleistocene in present-day Ethiopia approximately 200,000 years ago. More recent, somewhat surprising discoveries near Marrakech in Morocco suggest modern humans may have lived there as far back as 285,000 years ago. This indicates that the origin of modern humans could be more diverse than previously thought, with different groups of people of varying sizes and appearances living across Africa. While symbolic culture is not evident from this early period (285,000–100,000 years ago), it is reasonable to assume these humans were physically and behaviourally similar to us today. They had their own cultural traditions and histories and were aware political actors capable of consciously addressing challenges related to their lifestyles and societies.

Modern humans arrived in Europe about 45,000 years ago, towards the end of the last ice age. Their arrival coincided with the extinction of Neanderthals, our closest evolutionary relatives. Archaeological dates vary slightly, but Neanderthals disappeared either 4,000 or up to 20,000 years after modern humans arrived. There are multiple theories for their disappearance. In any case, modern humans interbred with Neanderthals, as evidenced by the fact that around 2% of the DNA of present-day humans outside Africa derives from Neanderthals.

The Holocene: An Era of Stability and Agricultural Beginnings

The Pleistocene ended with the conclusion of the last ice age and the beginning of the Holocene, around 11,500 years ago. The transition between these epochs is crucial to our discussion. The Pliocene was a period of steady cooling, while the Pleistocene featured dramatic temperature swings and ice ages. The Holocene ushered in a stable, warmer climate that allowed humans to begin experimenting with agriculture globally.

The steady temperatures of the Holocene provided predictable seasons and a climate suitable for domesticating and cultivating crops. I ask you to pay particular attention to the Holocene’s relatively stable temperatures—a unique period in the last six million years. Until the Holocene, our ancestors had lived as nomadic hunter-gatherers, moving to wherever food was available. Once a resource was depleted, they moved on.

This cultural pattern partly explains why modern humans travelled such great distances and settled vast parts of the planet during the last ice age. Only lions had previously spread as widely, but unlike lions, humans crossed vast bodies of water without fear. History has occasionally been marked by young reckless individuals, brimming with hormones and a desire to prove themselves (let’s call them “The Dudeson” types), who undertake risky ventures that ultimately benefit all humanity—such as crossing seas.

The stable Holocene climate also meant reliable rainfall and forest growth. Paleontologist and geologist R. Dale Guthrie (2005), who has studied Alaskan fossil records, describes the last ice age’s mammoth steppe. During that period, much of the Earth’s freshwater was locked in northern glaciers, leaving little moisture for clouds or rain. The mammoth steppe stretched from what is now northern Spain to Alaska, experiencing cold winters but sunny, relatively long summers. Humans, originating from African savannahs, thrived in this environment. Guthrie notes that ice age humans did not suffer from the common cold, which only emerged during the Holocene with domesticated animals.

The Anthropocene: Human Impact on Climate

The world as we know it exists within the context of Holocene. It is difficult to even imagine the conditions of the Pleistocene world. It is quite impossible for humans to even imagine what would the world be after the Holocene – and this moment is right now! Looking at the chart of global temperature history, we see that at the end of the Holocene, the temperature curve rises sharply. Since the Industrial Revolution in the 1800s, global temperatures have steadily increased. Because this warming is undoubtedly caused by humans, some suggest naming the period following the Holocene the Anthropocene—an era defined by human impact.

There is no consensus on how the Anthropocene will unfold, but atmospheric chemical changes and ice core records show that rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels are a serious concern. Before industrialisation in the 1700s, atmospheric CO2 was about 278 parts per million (ppm). CO2 levels have steadily risen, especially since the 1970s, when it was 326 ppm. Based on the annual analysis from NOAA’s Global Monitoring Lab (Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii), global average atmospheric carbon dioxide was 422.8 ppm in 2024, a new record high. Other dangerous greenhouse gases produced by industry and agriculture include methane and nitrous oxide.

Greenhouse gases like CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide act like the glass roof of a greenhouse. They trap heat that would otherwise escape into space, reflecting warmth back to Earth’s surface. Industrial and agricultural emissions have altered atmospheric chemistry, causing global warming. This excess heat triggers dangerous feedback loops, such as increased water vapour in the atmosphere, which further amplifies warming by trapping more heat.

Monitoring atmospheric changes is essential for understanding our future. Because of climate system lags behind, temperatures are expected to continue rising for decades as ocean currents release stored heat. Eventually, temperatures will stabilise as excess heat radiates into space.

Climate Change, Food Security, and Global Uncertainty

A peer-reviewed article published in Nature Communications by Kornhuber et al. (2023) explores how climate change affects global food security. Changes in the atmosphere’s high-altitude jet streams, known as Rossby waves, directly impact crop production in the Northern Hemisphere. Climate change can cause these jet streams to become stuck or behave unpredictably, but current crop and climate models often fail to account for such irregularities.

The disruption of wind patterns due to ongoing warming could simultaneously expose major agricultural regions—such as North America, Europe, India, and East Asia—to extreme weather events. Global food production currently relies on balancing yields across regions. If one area experiences crop failure, others compensate. However, the risk of multiple simultaneous crop failures increases vulnerability. Since 2015, hunger in the Global South has grown alarmingly, with no clear solutions to climate-induced risks.

The greatest threat to humanity’s future may not be warming itself or extreme weather, but the uncertainty and unpredictability it brings. The Holocene was an era of safety and predictability, much like the Nile’s reliable flooding assured stability for ancient Egyptians. This stability provided a secure framework within which humanity thrived. Although crop failures have occurred throughout history, nothing compares to the potential loss of Holocene-era climatic reliability–nothing.

Conclusion

The climatic history of our planet and our species shows that we have lived through dramatic shifts—from the warm Miocene, through ice age Pleistocene swings, to the uniquely stable Holocene. It is this stability that enabled the rise of agriculture, settled societies, and civilisation. Today, human activity is destabilising this balance, pushing us into the uncertain Anthropocene.

Understanding this deep history is crucial for grasping the scale of the challenge we face. Climate change threatens the predictability that has underpinned human survival and food security for millennia. The future depends on our capacity to respond to these changes with informed, collective action, such as those Naomi Klein advocates: redirecting wealth and effort toward sustainable, green infrastructure and restoration projects.


References

Gates, B. (2021). How to avoid a climate disaster: The solutions we have and the breakthroughs we need. Penguin Random House.

Guthrie, R. D. (2005). The nature of Paleolithic art. University of Chicago Press.

Klein, N. (2020). On fire: The (burning) case for a green new deal. Simon & Schuster.

Kornhuber, K., O’Gorman, P. A., Coumou, D., Petoukhov, V., Rahmstorf, S., & Hoerling, M. (2023). Amplified Rossby wave activity and its impact on food production stability. Nature Communications, 14(1), 1234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-XXX